Here I will put some citations and codes from a scam system presentation. The idea of those presentations is to manipulate the way you feel about it and not at all to give any arguments or proofs. Even it selects people who actually deserve to be scamed. Why? Because it it stated that the system is being stolen. And they are offered a low price stolen system. No really I think I would have no particular compassion towards their $299. What really is dangerous is to actually trade this system.
But here it is the SYSTEM.
Omni system platinum
I will put an end to all the scams (Nice huh). It is time somebody who has the guts and the strength to tell you the truth.
I have a trading system that for nine consecutive years was profitable. (On the backtest of course).
I was a chief programmer for a hedge fund (believe me please). We were tasked for a mission that has never been accomplished before (lol). The owner of fund was Dr. Cameron Heinz.
This guy (the best guy) was a pioneer in the field of Heuristics and its application in indirecto Problem Solving (that sound great). He is extremely rich. He has built some truly amazing unbeatable system that can accureately predict the market.
Here is how it works:
Parallel hybrid heuristics and parallel optimization. (Anybody knows what is that lol)
At the heart of the system is a database of chart patterns encrypted within the system (who the fuck is going to encrypt pennants and triangles LOL). These patterns are guarded heavily (oh please).
You can get extremely safe trades (everybody says so ;) ). And you will use winning price patterns.
The man who created that is Jonas Kaiser (nice name), one of the worlds most successful day traders (a kind of trading batman). He created 39 specific videos but only his friends are allowed to watch them. The techniques siphon money from the market with almost no risk (nice metaphore nothing more).
We turned each video technique into an algorithm within the database that the system could read. Each algorithm was then encrypted with KG-245A Fifth – generation of encryption (now the newbies are impressed for sure).
The system is so advanced that it actually learns more and more about the market as it is used.
We let it start with an account of &10 000 And within 3 days it had turned that $10 000 into just under $17 000. (Anyway this does not look like extremely safe trades ;))
A HUGE success. (;) I think they have been telling the same for the kamikazes).
It was so successful for the Hedge fund that I was fired. The senior managers do not require the programmers who develop the system (bool shit). I felt cheated and used (now this addresses the personal feeling of the potential scammed buyers, they are good compassionate souls). Now I cannot find a similar job with the same pay grade.
So as I had the 39 secret videos …After six months we made a home based system trading smaller accounts. We call it OMNI.
It was consistently profiting by 20 – 50 pips each day. (Daytraders love those numbers).
I found the system to make $1000 than to travel to the close ATM to take the money. (Well my ATM is just next door).
Now you will get your own copy of OMNI.
I make no apologies it costs $2000 an annual license.
The system makes $5000 even $6000 each day so why not. (well what about the small account and the extremely safe trades, some inconsistency there).
I have 5 people using the system (extremely privileged circle of traders and even two high-profile Wall Street traders (what?!), the idea of this is there is a privileged circle).
Now I am offering a way to profit from the system (Oh I really want it badly now ;) )
I will extend the opportunity to take it to the next level (this is a clear nlp language inducing into hypnosis).
If you had been an owner of OMNI since 2002 you can turn $2000 into $130 000. (of course in the back test I can achieve that on daily basis with almost every free EA).
And $10 000 will end as 1.3 million dollars. (Now the millionaire dream comes into play).
You have seen the inarguable truth (what please say it again I really like it).
You would have done a 2, 3 hours amount of work (hahaha).
And you can remove the profits and play with the house money (a typical gambler’s dream).
Now let see the core components.
Make money without significant effort and time commitment!
We use the brand new parallel hybrid heuristics technology: capable to see the Immediate future with Uncanny accuracy.
You get 3 add-on computational cores:
You have database encryption computational core
Parallel hybrid heuristics computational core
Stringent Purifying computational core (I am truly amazed by the name)
The price is $2 470 for activation fee and the annual subscription is $1 997.
So it makes $4 467.
Now we eat the activation fee + unlimited license. (wow)
You are going to pay not even $1497
You are going to pay not even $997
You are going to pay not even $997
You are going to pay not even $497
You are going to pay not even $297
If you act today it is $197 (Come on give it for free)
The value if the HUGE BONUS PACKAGE is valued at $8637
(I wonder how he gets to those numbers).
26.09.2012 г.
1.09.2012 г.
Trading NLP
Trading NLP! Does it exist? Definitely trading nlp exists and there are even books dedicated to NLP and trading.
The first question is what is NLP? According to Wikipedia
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is defined as an approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created in the 1970s. The title refers to a stated connection between the neurological processes ("neuro"), language ("linguistic"), and behavioral patterns that have been learned through experience ("programming") and can be organized to achieve specific goals in life.
The leading book for trading application of NLP is "NLP for Traders and investors: Personal Strategies to Give You the Edge Over Those Using Just Fundamental and Technical Analysis" by Terry Carroll.
From historical perspective NLP come with several books having more scientific perspective. The Structure of Magic I: A Book About Language and Therapy v. 1 (Structure of Magic): A Book About Language and Therapy.
Later its creators opted for more pragmatic and commercial evolution. The NLP has been simplifed and dedicated towards to ordinary public.
I think that this was partially (or mainly) the reason for the critical attitude from the scientific community. As you can read the main Wikipedia article this is the main thing that comes "According to certain neuroscientists,[3] psychologists,[4][5] and linguists,[6][7]NLP is unsupported by current scientific evidence, and uses incorrect and misleading terms and concepts."
Even more "Criticisms go beyond the lack of empirical evidence for effectiveness; critics say that NLP exhibits pseudoscientific characteristics,[14] title,[3] concepts and terminology.[6][15] NLP is used as an example of pseudoscience for facilitating the teaching of scientific literacy at the professional and university level.[7][16][17] NLP also appears on peer reviewed expert-consensus based lists of discredited interventions."[5]
OK you can read here as "discredited interventions","pseudoscience" and my favorite "lack of empirical evidence for effectiveness".
So you can ask WHY BOTHER with nlp.
I can structure my opinion as follows:
-I think that when NLP was created it was ahead of its time. As NLP is multidisciplinary (and scientists hate the multidisciplinary approach because that makes them work much harder). I think that pose a real problem of fair statistical evaluation. The reason is that it is too complex and a lot of bias can be achieved mainly by not understanding it.
-The second thing is that NLP is not science, it was developped as a technology. And NLP is technology. So NLP is not a unified scientific hypothesis as for example the Standard model in physics and if you disprove one part of the model the whole thing collapses. NLP is a set of techniques (I prefer the term psycho technology).
So my opinion is that NLP can and should be used pragmatically. That means to focus on a specific technique and approach and to see if it works or not and not to bother with the whole thing (being mostly not proved and criticisezed).
The NLP modelling
The NLP modelling for traders is probably the most central implications in practice. The reason is that trading is difficult and very psychologically demanding. And that may crack psychically even the most brilliant minds.
The ideas is to select the appropriate mind programs used by traders, to analyse them, to copy them and finally to use them.
That is the NLP perspective, in other words the most deep thaughts spoken by the masters are just words, unless you have the knowledge to implement that in practice.'
I really I am not sure but it is completely normal not to understand me for the moment.
The ideas is how to protect your self and to have a clear methodology for that.
That is why I am mostly interested in the modelling and the use of internal ressources part of NLP. The use of anchors and anchoring and conditionning is a valid scientific and psychological process. (Here again I am concerned about the most immediate scientific support and not the scientific validity of NLP in general).
Example of NLP modelling target strategy
So I would give an immediate example, otherwize it may remain totally unclear.
I was asking one trader what is his psychological attitude towards the EA optimization.
His answers is that for him that is a way to compute an optimum strategy. In that strategy the losses are a part of the strategy.
And here comes immediately a psychological strategy for dealing with the losses.
The next question was how he considers psychologically the losses?
The losses are a part of the strategy they are computed in the strategy and they are inevitable.
(So here this is not about reasonning it is about how psychologically you deal with the situation).
The next psychological test is if the losses are within the risk limits of the strategy or not and that need to be computed beforehands.
Then using the NLP you could program to follow that strategy using the typical methods that may be unique for every human being.
So here that is not the truth, that is just a technology to deal with the stress that comes from trading a EA. With the tools of NLP it is possible to incorporate that strategy without the NLP technology those are just words.
The first question is what is NLP? According to Wikipedia
Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is defined as an approach to communication, personal development, and psychotherapy created in the 1970s. The title refers to a stated connection between the neurological processes ("neuro"), language ("linguistic"), and behavioral patterns that have been learned through experience ("programming") and can be organized to achieve specific goals in life.
The leading book for trading application of NLP is "NLP for Traders and investors: Personal Strategies to Give You the Edge Over Those Using Just Fundamental and Technical Analysis" by Terry Carroll.
From historical perspective NLP come with several books having more scientific perspective. The Structure of Magic I: A Book About Language and Therapy v. 1 (Structure of Magic): A Book About Language and Therapy.
Later its creators opted for more pragmatic and commercial evolution. The NLP has been simplifed and dedicated towards to ordinary public.
I think that this was partially (or mainly) the reason for the critical attitude from the scientific community. As you can read the main Wikipedia article this is the main thing that comes "According to certain neuroscientists,[3] psychologists,[4][5] and linguists,[6][7]NLP is unsupported by current scientific evidence, and uses incorrect and misleading terms and concepts."
Even more "Criticisms go beyond the lack of empirical evidence for effectiveness; critics say that NLP exhibits pseudoscientific characteristics,[14] title,[3] concepts and terminology.[6][15] NLP is used as an example of pseudoscience for facilitating the teaching of scientific literacy at the professional and university level.[7][16][17] NLP also appears on peer reviewed expert-consensus based lists of discredited interventions."[5]
OK you can read here as "discredited interventions","pseudoscience" and my favorite "lack of empirical evidence for effectiveness".
So you can ask WHY BOTHER with nlp.
I can structure my opinion as follows:
-I think that when NLP was created it was ahead of its time. As NLP is multidisciplinary (and scientists hate the multidisciplinary approach because that makes them work much harder). I think that pose a real problem of fair statistical evaluation. The reason is that it is too complex and a lot of bias can be achieved mainly by not understanding it.
-The second thing is that NLP is not science, it was developped as a technology. And NLP is technology. So NLP is not a unified scientific hypothesis as for example the Standard model in physics and if you disprove one part of the model the whole thing collapses. NLP is a set of techniques (I prefer the term psycho technology).
So my opinion is that NLP can and should be used pragmatically. That means to focus on a specific technique and approach and to see if it works or not and not to bother with the whole thing (being mostly not proved and criticisezed).
The NLP modelling
The NLP modelling for traders is probably the most central implications in practice. The reason is that trading is difficult and very psychologically demanding. And that may crack psychically even the most brilliant minds.
The ideas is to select the appropriate mind programs used by traders, to analyse them, to copy them and finally to use them.
That is the NLP perspective, in other words the most deep thaughts spoken by the masters are just words, unless you have the knowledge to implement that in practice.'
I really I am not sure but it is completely normal not to understand me for the moment.
The ideas is how to protect your self and to have a clear methodology for that.
That is why I am mostly interested in the modelling and the use of internal ressources part of NLP. The use of anchors and anchoring and conditionning is a valid scientific and psychological process. (Here again I am concerned about the most immediate scientific support and not the scientific validity of NLP in general).
Example of NLP modelling target strategy
So I would give an immediate example, otherwize it may remain totally unclear.
I was asking one trader what is his psychological attitude towards the EA optimization.
His answers is that for him that is a way to compute an optimum strategy. In that strategy the losses are a part of the strategy.
And here comes immediately a psychological strategy for dealing with the losses.
The next question was how he considers psychologically the losses?
The losses are a part of the strategy they are computed in the strategy and they are inevitable.
(So here this is not about reasonning it is about how psychologically you deal with the situation).
The next psychological test is if the losses are within the risk limits of the strategy or not and that need to be computed beforehands.
Then using the NLP you could program to follow that strategy using the typical methods that may be unique for every human being.
So here that is not the truth, that is just a technology to deal with the stress that comes from trading a EA. With the tools of NLP it is possible to incorporate that strategy without the NLP technology those are just words.
Абонамент за:
Публикации (Atom)